Home > Beading Mats, Trays & Boards > Beadalon Bead Board 34-Inch
Image of Beadalon Bead Board 34-Inch: Bestviewsreviews

Beadalon Bead Board 34-Inch

Beadalon bead board,Strong with beads
Amazon
All Buying Options
Add to Wishlist
9.5
9.5010

BVR Rating

278 reviews
Build quality

9.2

9.2010
Capacity

9.7

9.7010
Convenience

9.4

9.4010
Design

9.7

9.7010
Overall satisfaction

8.9

8.9010
Packaging

9.6

9.6010
Size

9.4

9.4010
Sturdiness

9.6

9.6010
Value for money

9.3

9.3010

Reasons to buy

  • Flocked grey surface reduces eyestrain and helps keep objects in place
  • Perfect for organizing beads, findings, and stringing materials
  • Makes a great addition to your stringing area

Drawback

  • May be too light in weight

Products Similar to beadalon Beading Mats, Trays & Boards

The Beadsmith Bead Board with Cover, Grey Flocked, 3 U-Shaped Channels, 6 Recessed Compartments, 9.75 x 13.25 inches, Design Boards for Creating Bracelets, Necklaces and Other Jewelry

the Beadsmith bead board,the Flocked surface,6 recessed sections,multi Strand bracelets

9.8
9.8010
BVR Rating 1,252 reviews

The BeadSmith Travel Bead Design in Beading Board and Gray Flock with Lid, 7.75 by 11.25-Inch

The BeadSmith Travel Bead Design,Beading Board,1.775 by 11.25-Inch

9.2
9.2010
BVR Rating 66 reviews

The Beadsmith Bead MAT 3 PC Set 11 X 14

The Beadsmith Bead MAT 3 PC Set 11 X 14

9.3
9.3010
BVR Rating 275 reviews
View Comparison
Analysis of 200+ reviews for Beadalon Bead Board 34-Inch
img-alt

BestViewsReviews analyzed 3,247 reviews for 8 products in the Beading Mats, Trays & Boards category.

img-alt

We analyzed a total of 278 reviews for this product out of which, 0 reviews were received in the last 6 months.

img-alt

The analysis indicates that around 88% reviews were positive while around 10% of reviews had negative sentiment.

BestViewsReviews Ranking and Score for Beadalon Bead Board 34-Inch
img-alt

This product received a total score of 9.47 out of 10 , based on review sentiments and user opinions related to 9 features:

Build quality
Capacity
Convenience
Design
Overall satisfaction
Packaging
Size
Sturdiness
Value for money
Was this page helpful to you?