Academic Planner 2024-2025 - Hourly 2024-2025 Planner Weekly and Monthly
What we analysed
BVR’s AI bot is continuously reading, learning and evolving to generate reviews.
19,417 reviews
covering
59 products
for the category
Planners
Experiential insights by users
About Academic Planner 2024-2025 - Hourly 2024-2025 Planner Weekly and Monthly
Overall Feedback:
77% positive
73% liked the sturdy binding, but 27% found it came apart easily
I have a planner with a soft leather cover, spiral binding, and 2 ribbon page markers.
I received the planner pages on March 26, 2024, even though they were shipped starting from May 27th 2024, which means I won't be able to use it for the next 2 months.
77% liked the attractive design, whereas 23% didn't
I like the cover of the planner, but it tends to attract dust or paper specs.
I chose this planner because of its simple design both inside and outside.
The planner has a nice quality with a soft leather cover, spiral binding, and 2 ribbon page markers.
I feel that the planner looks and feels cheap compared to other products of similar price.
Show more
76% appreciated the paper quality, but 24% didn't
The planner has nice quality.
My expectation was for the calendar to start from April, but it actually starts from June.
I had to cut the planner in the middle but it didn't help much.
77% praised the intuitive layout, but 23% found it cluttered
The spiral piece is built inside the cover pages, preventing it from snagging on anything.
The planner layout is good, but the material quality is poor.
82% praised the convenient size
I bought a smaller version of the planner which is lighter and has a smaller footprint on my desk, making it easier to travel with.
I used the larger version first but then downsized to the smaller one. It's easier to pack and keep in my purse.
I appreciate the spiral piece built inside the cover pages, which prevents snagging and makes it easy to carry the planner to and from school. The pages are thick enough to use any writing tool.
75% were impressed with the usability, while 25% weren't
The calendar should start from April and May since January, instead of June.
