Zink 2"x3" Premium Instant Photo Paper (50 Pack) Compatible with Polaroid Snap
What we analysed
BVR’s AI bot is continuously reading, learning and evolving to generate reviews.
21,776 reviews
covering
56 products
for the category
Photo Paper
Experiential insights by users
About Zink 2"x3" Premium Instant Photo Paper (50 Pack) Compatible with Polaroid Snap
Overall Feedback:
86% positive
82% liked its long-lasting durability, but 18% found it prone to damage
The paper quality is the same as the original Canon papers. I think they just print their name on the box and mark up the price.
This photo paper is more durable and produces more vibrant pictures. I also had to adjust the picture less and it comes out leaps better than the recommended canon sheets.
In my experience, the prints come out muddy and flat despite the images looking good in the camera.
When I print out, the quality worsens.
83% praised for its compatibility with various inks, while 17% experienced compatibility issues
The print quality is good.
I am happy to report that the paper works the same as Kodak zinc paper at half the cost.
The ink cartridges are not compatible with my Canon mini printer.
The prints come out muddy and flat with whites being some shade of tan or even gray. Reds go flat in my prints.
67% liked the smooth paper texture, but 33% preferred a more textured finish
I have never had a problem with the paper until I received the new paper. I am not sure if the problem is with the print or the paper.
The pictures are sticky-back and the cover sheet on the back of the print is not easy to remove, indicating that the paper texture of the photo-paper is difficult to handle.
81% praised for its vibrant print quality, while 19% noticed blurry images
I found that photos come out better with a vintage color/polaroid look.
I am disappointed with the color quality of the printed photos as they do not match the original photos.
I compared the camera quality of the older polaroids with the newer version and found the older ones to have better camera quality.
I noticed that the prints come out muddy and flat, despite the images looking good in the camera.
The prints look muddy and flat despite good images in the camera.
74% appreciated the sturdy paper thickness, while 26% found it too flimsy
I have mentioned that the pictures are sticky-back and explained the difficulty in removing the cover sheet from the back of the print.
Rephrased: The pictures are sticky-back and it's difficult to remove the cover sheet from the back of the print.
