Canon MP-101 4-Inch x 6-Inch Matte Photo Paper
What we analysed
BVR’s AI bot is continuously reading, learning and evolving to generate reviews.
21,776 reviews
covering
50+ products
for the category
Photo Paper
Experiential insights by users
About Canon MP-101 4-Inch x 6-Inch Matte Photo Paper
Overall Feedback:
77% positive
72% liked its long-lasting durability
The paper holds up well for making small boxes, labels, and tags, although it is slightly thinner than card stock.
I have not had any defective prints to date with the excellent quality of the matte finish photo paper.
74% praised for its compatibility with various inks, while 26% experienced compatibility issues
For any Canon printer, it's best to buy paper that is compatible.
I could observe a subtle difference in the paper while folding it under a good light source.
Glossy paper and matte paper have different ink compatibility and require specific settings for each.
I printed a photo on it and it did not look good. It looks more like a newspaper.
Show more
73% liked the smooth paper texture, but 27% preferred a more textured finish
The print is bright and sharp without any shine.
The paper texture is higher quality than regular paper and as thick as photo paper, but feels more like regular paper.
76% praised for its vibrant print quality, while 24% noticed blurry images
If you print on the wrong side of the paper, you will get poor results. But if you print on the correct side, you will get beautiful quality with rich blacks, vibrant colors, and sharp edges.
My Canon pictures have faded badly over time, while the HP paper is still looking good after 9 months.
I was surprised by the dull quality of the paper. It's difficult to determine the printable side and the printouts are not very bright.
I cannot recommend this paper for quality photo printing as it does not produce vibrant colors as advertised.
64% appreciated the sturdy paper thickness, while 36% found it too flimsy
I could have achieved the same result with cardstock instead of using thick paper.
