Canon 7981A004 Photo Paper Plus
What we analysed
BVR’s AI bot is continuously reading, learning and evolving to generate reviews.
21,776 reviews
covering
56 products
for the category
Photo Paper
Experiential insights by users
About Canon 7981A004 Photo Paper Plus
Overall Feedback:
90% positive
86% liked its long-lasting durability
I have noticed that the paper is slightly thinner than card stock but holds up well for making small boxes, labels, and tags.
81% praised for its compatibility with various inks, while 19% experienced compatibility issues
I was disappointed with the result of printing a photo on the paper. I felt like I wasted a dollar on ink.
Canon USA has specified that this is only compatible with Inkjet printers.
The colors and intensity of printed images are a little lackluster, especially with black ink.
84% liked the smooth paper texture, but 16% preferred a more textured finish
On the right side of the paper, there is a lightly textured surface and it is brighter white.
I prefer using paper for photos as it produces deeper and smoother blacks and colors compared to card stock.
I have noticed that the paper holds up well for making small boxes, labels, and tags despite being slightly thinner than card stock.
I was expecting a matte photo paper texture, but it turned out to be closer to regular paper or very smooth thin weight card stock.
Show more
83% praised for its vibrant print quality, while 17% noticed blurry images
I get the best results on landscape photos from Canon Photo Paper Plus Semi-gloss and prints from this paper are always outstanding.
The only issue with the photo-paper is that both sides look almost the same while only one side will print correctly.
Over time, Canon pictures have faded badly while HP paper still looks like the day it was printed.
It is difficult to determine which side is the printable side and the printouts are not very bright.
84% appreciated the sturdy paper thickness, while 16% found it too flimsy
I had trouble printing the top sheet because it was too thick.
