Brother PT-M95 P-Touch Monochrome Label Maker Bundle
What we analysed
BVR’s AI bot is continuously reading, learning and evolving to generate reviews.
52,913 reviews
covering
64 products
for the category
Office Electronics
Experiential insights by users
About Brother PT-M95 P-Touch Monochrome Label Maker Bundle
Overall Feedback:
80% positive
71% praised the long-lasting battery life, while 29% found it drained quickly
I find the battery life unsatisfactory.
The battery life is short and it drained when I accidentally left it ON.
The product drains 4 AAA batteries almost immediately.
I added brand new batteries but still getting low battery warning on the screen.
Show more
75% appreciated the multiple connectivity options, though 25% found them limited
I labeled my golf clubs with my name and phone number using the device in case one gets left on the course.
The label maker is only battery powered, which is a small complaint and a negative aspect of the product.
67% praised the crisp and clear display, while 33% found it lacked brightness
The print quality of PT-D220 is much better than PT-M95. It uses the available vertical space on the tape much better with less top/bottom margins compared with the PT-M95's output.
The print quality is okay.
After printing a few labels and turning it off, I noticed that the printer turns off after starting to print the next time I want to use it. It won't work unless I have brand new batteries, even though my battery tester says the batteries are fine.
The directions are hard to read without X-Ray vision and a Magnifying Glass. The diagrams are extremely difficult to decipher.
Show more
74% appreciated the sturdy and durable build, though 26% found it flimsy
I will try a different brand as the durability and reliability of the product have decreased.
83% appreciated the ergonomic design for comfort, though 17% found it uncomfortable
When I hold the printer, the cutter is in the way of my left index finger.
I find the new version too small, suggesting that the ergonomic design may not be suitable for me.
73% loved the responsive and quiet keyboard, but 27% found it unresponsive
I find that the soft keys require a heavy typing hand and cause missed letters.
Sometimes the print quality is faded.
The buttons are small and close together, making it difficult for me to use the keyboard with my long nails or big hands. Additionally, finding symbols like / or $ is challenging.
When I powered on the device, it made a noise and the electronics were failing. This could be the reason why the other person returned it.
Show more
68% liked the quiet operation, but 32% found it noisy
When I power on the device, it makes a noise and the electronics seem to be failing, which might be the reason why the other person returned it.
I had to replace the batteries twice after initially getting batteries for it, indicating that the product is noisy.
The navigation is overly complex.
77% loved the fast and efficient performance, but 23% experienced lag
With the PT-D220, I can use the available vertical space on the tape much better, resulting in better print quality and less top/bottom margins compared to the PT-M95s output.
I find that the soft keys require a heavy typing hand and can cause missed letters if pushed on the side instead of the center.
For some reason, the device uses a lot of juice and requires 4AAA batteries.
The labeler performs well, but the user interface design is horrible.
